Aberlour A’bunadh Batch 63

How’s this for a bit of Wilde-ian turnabout: the only thing worse than your favorite whisky being discontinued is when it becomes a smashing success.

When the whisky in question is produced by a craft distiller, the result is bottles flying off the shelves and hitting the secondary market at extortionate prices. When the “million dollar baby” is the property of a large beverage conglomerate, one can typically count on consistent supply (albeit with variable quality) while retail prices take a series of opportunistic jumps.

The fallout is predictable: the people that love a whisky suddenly despise it, or at least its makers. A torchlit online procession is hastily organized, rallying around throaty cries of “never again.” Lists of alternatives and substitutes are promulgated. The Scotch whisky industry teaches another masterclass in golden goose killing.

This was the case with Aberlour A’bunadh. To the credit of the team, MALT has heretofore avoided jumping directly into the debate. Resisting the siren call of the page views and likes that would have surely followed a double-barreled condemnation, the A’bunadh coverage has been limited to a few glancing blows by way of passing mentions in other reviews.

The conventional wisdom states that “when a thing ceases to be a subject of controversy, it ceases to be a subject of interest.” (Astoundingly, the bloke who coined this said it in 1830, anticipating social media by 150 years). However, there’s a well-known contrarian streak here at MALT. Keeping with that ethos, I have tried to gleefully embrace any opportunity to think and say and do something different than everybody else.

Thus, my rusty mental gears started their creaking rotations when I saw that A’bunadh was on sale at my local. It was obvious that trying to say something fair (not to mention new) about this whisky would be a self-defeating exercise in futility. As though one could possibly disentangle the judgment of this whisky from a maelstrom of sanctimonious outrage surrounding it! Once it became clear to me that I couldn’t possibly write a review of A’bunadh, I knew that I had to write a review of A’bunadh.

I’m nearly certain not a single MALT reader is unfamiliar with this expression, but – for the purposes of formality – a brief description will now commence:

“A’bunadh” is said to mean “the original” in Gaelic, though this (and every other aspect of this whisky) seems to be the subject of some debate. It is described, officially, as “sherried and intense.” To quote a young English poet, “that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” Matured entirely in sherry casks and not chill filtered, it is bottled at cask strength. A’bunadh does not carry an age statement but is released in batches, reportedly from casks between five and 25 years of age.

Mark last reviewed a bottle of Batch #37 back in 2012, describing it as “cracking value for money” at £35. The major controversy surrounding this expression stems from the subsequent series of price increases, specifically mid-2018’s jump from an MSRP of around £50 to the “new normal” of £80. The worldwide interwebs dot com did its usual thing when the news broke, with all manner of digital chest pounding and hand wringing ensuing. The collective ire of the whisky commentariat was directed at parent company Pernod Ricard, with longtime partisans vowing to swear off A’bunadh for good.

A wise primary school teacher once counseled parents: “Don’t believe everything your children say about me, and I won’t believe everything they say about you.” As an American, I bear this in mind whenever a Brit talks about a Frenchman, or vice-versa. With that caveat: Adam mellifluously evoked the perceived Gallic attitude at play here. It’s a French take on the coarse, inhuman indifference to the well-being of your fellow man endemic to the outer boroughs of New York; “Le Fug Youse” as a late writer (far better than I’ll ever be) aptly put it.

Still: as a believer in the moderately-regulated free market economy, I am loathed to jump on the bandwagon. A’bunadh doesn’t exist in a vacuum; among NAS cask-strength sherried Speyside malts, it is competing with Macallan’s increasingly dear trophy bottlings and Glenfarclas 105, to name but two. Point being: we’re consumers in free countries, and we’re empowered to buy other products if we don’t see value for money. Noortje advised that the aggrieved parties should look towards independent bottlings of Aberlour, which is good counsel more generally (so long as one can find them).

Playing the most diabolical devil’s advocate I can conjure: we, the whisky consuming public, don’t “own” these whiskies. They may be our favorites, or our dad’s favorites, or our dad’s dad’s favorites, but that doesn’t make them our property. Their lawful owners (those who risked their financial capital to buy the distilleries and associated intangibles such as brands and trademarks) can charge as little or as much for them as they think the market will bear. Sudden jumps in MSRP risk alienating a price-conscious segment of the drinking population, but they might also attract an (ahem) less price-conscious segment of the drinking population… and who wants a bunch of cheapskates for customers?

All this to say: cool it. Channel your inner Frenchman (or woman) and give a resigned shrug, palms facing upwards, when you notice that the price of your go-to whisky has been raised 60%, just cause. “People just ain’t no good,” and there are other whiskies on the shelf. You’ve been gifted the golden opportunity to find something else, something perhaps even better than A’bunadh! I’m sorry for your loss, but also: you’re welcome!

I don’t know that any of this is a direct contribution to the debate, so much as a contribution to the meta-debate: the debate about the debate. And yet, at the heart of it all sits a bottle of whisky, which can (and must) be opened, smelled, tasted, and judged on its own merits. Laden with the weight of the above (and exhausted with my endless slog through a morass of craft bourbon), I have breached the crimson wax seal. Here we go…

This is batch #63, bottled at 61%. This bottle has “2018/05/03” laser-etched on the back. I paid $80 for a bottle on sale, though the price has recently been put back up to $90. The Whisky Exchange have batch #62 available for £79.95, or you can take a pot luck approach with Amazon for £79.80 and see what batch number lands on your doorstep. Or the gents at Master of Malt have Batch #62 for £79.80. An earlier batch is also available via SharedPour for $127.99.

Aberlour A’bunadh Batch 63 – review

Color: Orange-tinged light chestnut.

On the nose: Sherried and intense, innit? Sticky toffee pudding. Salted smoked caramel. Chocolate fudge. Hershey’s chocolate syrup. Chocolate-covered cherries. Did I mention chocolate? Oh, here comes pecan pie filling! There’s a hint of freshly-planed pine wood banging around in there as well. A whiff of cask funkiness comes through in the form of a damp seaweed note, though not enough to detract from the overwhelmingly rich gooeyness of this soporific postprandial tidal wave.

In the mouth: This is really quite pert to start, with a note of mandarin orange. Suddenly, a fiery alcoholic heat overwhelms the palate. At midpalate this becomes nearly unendurably hot and fierce before easing into a long finish of Swiss Miss hot cocoa mix. Dilution brings this nearly into line, with dried fruits and cocoa notes punching and counterpunching above a molten sea of alcoholic heat. It’s the distilled equivalent of the scene at the end of Star Wars Episode III when Obi-Wan and Anakin battle it out above the volcanic rivers of Mustafar.


The mother of all cask strength sherry bombs. It’s not a style that appeals to everyone, though it certainly has its acolytes. An evening ender, I write at the end of an evening. Once you’ve gone A’bunadh, you can’t go back.

Is it worth $80, the same as Glenfarclas 105? I think so. $90, same as the Macallan Classic Cut? Perhaps. More than that? I’ll buy it again, or perhaps I won’t. You’ll buy it again, or somebody will, at the current price or higher. Or you’ll buy something else. Life goes on. “Nous sommes tous des fleurs planteé sur cette terre que Dieu cuielle en son temps.”

Score: 8/10 for me, but really (your opinion)/10.

Lead image from the Whisky Exchange and there are commission links within this review, but this never affects our opinion.

CategoriesSingle Malt
  1. Lachlan says:

    The price increase was so sudden and steep though and it seems to have been done to make way for two NAS’s that have entered the market Aberlour Casg Annamh at 48% and Aberlour Triple Cask at 40% so no wonder the paying public have been up in arms. The ratings for A’bunadh are now skewed as people are angry about the price.

    Will I still buy it? Yes, if it is on offer from Amazon.co.uk for £60. At the price it is now are there more interesting prospects, arguably yes Old Perth 22yo 1996 was £75 the whisky broker have a 22 yo Distilled at Speyside Distillery for £58 that will be bumped up with delivery but still makes it cheaper than the A’Bunadh when not on deal. Meanwhile Tamdhu Batch Strength is £60 and 58.8 % Vol. They’ve shot themselves in the foot and opened our eyes to the existence of other options!

    1. Taylor says:

      Lachlan, thanks for weighing in with some good suggestions. My local hits you (me) about $90 for the Tamdhu Batch Strength, making it a perfect comparison for A’bunadh. Maybe a future MALT review? Cheers again for stopping by.

  2. Phil says:

    Pernod-Ricard have form with massive spikes in price….they have done similar things to Jameson with the recently re-issued 18 year old and have repackaged the Midleton Barry Crockett which I am sure means a hefty price rise if the Dair Ghaelach range is anything to go by.

    Taking currency conversion into account you paid around £62 for your bottle which I believe is a fair price, in line with offerings from Tamdhu, Benriach, Glendronach to name a few. I think Pernod-Ricard did get their pricing wrong once we hit the heady heights of £80 ($105) which opens up a world of better value (in my humble opinion) whiskies – Rebreast 12 cask strength, Glendronach 18 etc. They even crazily reduced the size of the Aberlour 18 bottle to 50cl and are charging well over £100 for that.

    As you have stated there are plenty of options at all price levels in whisky but I do think Aberlour/Pernod-Ricard have inadvertently pushed many away from their products through poorly conceived pricing. I stated in a previous review there is an opportunity cost in every transaction…that cost for me is now too high when looking at A’bunadh.

    Good piece though Taylor…although, lose the french…to quote Blades of Glory ‘No one knows what it means, but it’s provocative!’

    1. Taylor says:

      Phil, appreciate the compliment. Your point is well-taken: at the current price, A’bunadh has put itself in a league with some more serious competition. A difficult part of writing this was attempting to isolate my thoughts on this whisky from not only the specific price increase debate, but the broader context of “what else could I have at this cost?”

      Respectfully, the French stays put, though reviewing this just now makes me realize it should have been “planteés.” If there’s an immutable law of the universe, it must be that someone trying to sound clever by using a quote in a foreign language must suffer a typographical error in the reproduction of that quote.

      Thanks again!

    2. Welsh Toro says:

      Nice one Phil. Totally agree. My sherry bomb choice has been a rather regular Glenlivet 11 by Signatory. I’ve had a couple and no flaws. It’s cask strength and good value around £50.

  3. Graham says:

    Taylor, I really enjoyed this review, and particularly the debate about the debate. I generally feel that there are so many whiskies in the world it seems a shame to keep drinking any “favorite” rather like reading the same book over and over. One interesting comment on price is that, in the UK, once you hit £80 many of the distillery bottle-your-own choices become available and with a little charm the staff will mail them out directly.

    1. Taylor says:

      Graham, thanks for the kind words. I share your FOMO on the old favorite vs. new whisky conundrum. Unfortunately the bottle-your-own choices are not an option for us here stateside, but (as noted above) there are plenty of official bottlings of sherried whisky – not to mention the independents – that are accessible around the $90 A’bunadh price.


  4. NOTNICE_75 says:

    Alright Taylor? Enjoying the weather? After the vortex, we’re sending some molten ice your way later today. You’re going to need that A’bunadh! Alternatively, the Glengoyne Cask Strength can be had for a rather more agreeable $65.00 (at least, on shelves in the Quad Cities)…it’s not quite as rich nor as viscous as the Aberlour, and feels like a more significant proportion of relatively young whiskies…but for the ticket price, it’s a worthwhile consideration in the the NAS sherry bomb category. Cheers mate!

  5. Taylor says:

    Alright NOTNICE, good to hear from you again. Survived the polar vortex with all fingers and toes accounted for; more than one dram was consumed.

    Thanks for the recommendation on the Glengoyne. Looks like it runs $70 around here. Another one for the NAS cask strength sherried substitutes list!

  6. Welsh Toro says:

    Provocative stuff Taylor. Some might say fighting talk. We’ll dispense with the Frenchy stuff (I know they like their Aberlour) and simply say, with some old fashioned British candour, that Pernod Ricard are taking the piss. I’m not that bothered in the scheme of things. There are far too many interesting things in the world to get too upset about a NAS sherry bomb. Nevertheless, this whole business deserves a little scrutiny.

    A’bunadh was an interesting whisky because it proved that NAS (young) whisky could be very fine providing it was whacked up to cask strength to disguise any deficiencies. For £40 quid what’s not to like? At £80 quid it tastes half as good. We don’t have to buy it though, as you say. Like all good free market theory, though, there’s a fly in the ointment. Here, in good old Blighty where all this shit is actually made, you can’t buy Classic Cut and only a rich man or idiot would pay Macallan prices. There’s Glenfarclas 105, which still retails for £50 but I don’t like as much as A’bunadh. I actually buy independent sherry bombs, with age statements, that are cheaper and better. Where does this leave us?

    I’m not going to buy it anymore and that’s true of everyone I know that drinks whisky. There’s a lot of people I don’t know that drink whisky and I suspect it’s the same for them. Golden Goose indeed. A’bunadh used to be on sale in supermarkets. Not any more. Your average Joe is not going to pay £80+ for whisky. They thought they could get away with it but it’s a horrendous own goal. Each batch used to sell fast but batch 62 has been hanging around and Amazon were selling it for £60 over Christmas in order to shift it.

    So, be careful what you wish for. A’bunadh is good but not that good. That is true of Aberlour in general and it has not gone unnoticed that the 18 year old has also jumped in price and at 43% it’s not competitive (Macallan they ain’t). It’s not demand Taylor, they just take the piss. Just for the record I have some Batch 62, not one of the better ones, 86/100. Very enjoyable review. Cheers. WT

    1. Taylor says:

      Welcome back, WT! Thanks for the thoughts on all this. I’ve recently been reflecting on the “premiumisation” debacle at Mortlach. Diageo put the price up, nobody bought it, they put the price back down. Hopefully Pernod Ricard can be similarly convinced. As the volume of comments here shows, there’s no shortage of substitutes, nor any shortage of unhappy customers looking to make the swap. I guess the point of this review was to say that A’bunadh is good high-octane sherried malt if you like that sort of thing, and what you pay for it (or refuse to pay for it) is between you and the Man from Galilee. Thanks again for the engagement! Regards, TC

  7. French Whisky Lover says:

    “Nous sommes toutes des fleurs plantées sur cette Terre que Dieu cueille en son temps” is the correct spelling 😉 whatever that really means…

    Personnally, I’d say Pernod-Ricard simply raise their price just like ALL other distilleries in the meantime. Ok, it might be a strong increase in a short time, but it just follows the general trend.
    It’s even possible A’bunadh is a normaly priced product in a few years time. If not, why would they care ? You buy it, they win, you buy the Casg Anamh or the new other NAS instead, they win. You don’t buy them, someone else will. Don’t worry for them, they will sell their stuff, because whisky lovers are not rational and because Edrington does the same with whisky that is not of better quality (Macallan included…).

    1. Taylor says:

      Now THAT’S the French ‘tude I was looking for!

      Seriously though, thanks for the correction. It’s a quote from a Théophane Vénard letter reproduced by Danh Vo. Look it up- it’s beautiful and benefits from context.


      1. French Whisky Lover says:

        Thank you Taylor, I will.

        (got an ad today for the new Macallan “Concept Number 1″… 159 € for a 40% NAS… Hilarious. Lovely bottle though. That’s probably the concept or I am too vulgar to understand it. Perhaps.)

  8. Juju says:

    People have too much time on their hands whining. Buy it if you like, if the price deters you, find another one. Simple. I don’t see what’s so hard with that. The good – and bad – thing today is that we are inundated with a lot of whisky. Surely, you can find a suitable replacement. I’ve always thought that the journey is what’s most important. Sure, we stop along the way and smell the flowers but nothing lasts forever. This is your chance to finally get on another train and move on. I’ve had this and it ain’t bad. It didn’t shake my world either, so I’m fine without it. Ymmv, of course.

    1. Taylor says:

      That’s the practical conclusion, Juju. And I don’t disagree essentially. However, someone else might say “people have too much time on their hands, writing voluminous whisky reviews.” We are here to stop and dwell and cogitate and debate. Thanks to you, and thanks to everyone for their engagement!

      1. dutchguy89 says:

        €32,50 excluding shipment. Including shipment it’ll cost you around €40,- To compare: The glenfarclas 25 costs €100,-

  9. Tam o' Banter says:

    I do not share the American attitude towards “the free market”. The whisky world is being carved-up, hollowed-out and sucked-dry by psychotic CEOs and Machiavellian Multinationals who don’t give a damn about my heritage.
    The Scottish government should step in and do something.

    1. Taylor says:

      A provocative stance, Tam. I’m interested to hear more. Short of a full nationalization of production (turning Scotland into the Venezuela of whisky), do you have any suggestions for pragmatic steps that the government could take to protect the national whisky heritage?

  10. David likes Scotch says:

    Well, l see the debate is live and well with respect to the high price of this whisky. Question.. Does one buy scotch for the taste or does one buy because it was cheap. l buy scotch for the taste and if it so happens to be on sale ” BONUS “. What gets me upset is when the price jumps up for the same bottle that was on the shelve last night. i.e. 18 year old at $79.00, next day $179.00. same inventory but $100 more per bottle. l don’t buy that bottle anymore. If $179.00 is the new price point then that opens up a whole selection of single malt for me. I live in Nova Scotia Canada and the price is $97.00 (around L55 I believe). This is a good deal I know but it is the taste that is the true deal. Last note.. I live in a country with one of the highest tax rates, a country that every provincial government controls the pricing within their border and the kicker is they will not allow cross-border shopping. I cannot even purchase scotch from any auction and have it shipped to Canada. NOT ALLOWED.

    1. Taylor says:

      David: frankly, I was surprised how much bank-and-forth this generated. I was pretty sure people had spent themselves already (which would give the review a bit of room to breathe), but I clearly misjudged the depth of the well of collective ire regarding this move from Pernod Ricard. I can assure you that liquor laws are not much better south of the border; this is especially true in my home state of Illinois, which has all sorts of regulations to keep the middlemen (themselves generous lobbyists) in business. Thanks for weighing in!

      1. David likes Scotch says:

        Thanks Taylor for your reply. My hope is that you and the other watcher can help me out with a review of the batch 49 of A’bunadh. I have read the posted reviews of this batch but not a true comparison between this batch and others. The reason I’m asking this question is because batch 58 was and has been my only exposure to this line of scotch. I was very impressed with my first tasting. I was so taken by this malt I began the hunt for earlier releases, “BINGO” I came across 4 bottles of batch 49 just a few months ago. The colour was so dark I just couldn’t leave any behind. All are still sealed and I am just waiting for some room to open up in my cabinet. Is batch 49 really as good as the reviews say? Or is the reviews based on the comparison of the batch or two before this one which may not have met one’s standard.

        1. Taylor says:

          David, as you are in possession of four bottles, I’d say that you are uniquely well positioned to provide a review of that batch. Or, if you insist on a second opinion, I’d happily accept a dram from you for evaluation 😉

          1. David likes Scotch says:

            Once again thanks for your comments. I will let you know my thoughts on this batch once the seal is cracked on my first bottle. The other ones are being kept for my retirement, which is just 16 months away. Stocking up now while still employed. Fixed income is scary enough… no need to have the cabinet empty. Take care and thanks again.

  11. Taylor says:

    David: in that case, take care and enjoy your retirement. Come on back and give us your thoughts on the batch 49 once you have a chance to enjoy it. Cheers!

  12. JOHN MOTZI says:

    A’bunadh is one of my favorites – In recent years I have worked my way through #49, #54, #58 and currently I am on #61. Anyway I saw that it was on sale at my local establishment today for $69.

    1. O D Jones says:

      Late to the party here but I thought I would post an update… Here in the Tampa Bay area the current batch is on the shelves from $109 to $129 a bottle. My first bottle I bought years ago was Batch 28; the first bottle at $59 was so extraordinary I went out and bought another bottle of that batch to tuck away in the cabinet, for my old age LOL. Since then I’ve had two bottlings in the 50s that weren’t particularly special, and I believe the price was closer to $80 for those. I think the current boom for bourbon has brought a bit of a price adjustment downward for single malts, perhaps not in this case, but I was seeing bottles of Lagavulin 16 in the $119 range there for a few years, (the Nick Offerman effect??? God bless him, seems like a very nice man, and he has fine taste in whiskey!) but the 16 now seems to be back around a hundred bucks in general. Good old Ardbeg 10 is still around $50, and 10 year old Talisker has been stable in the seventies range for as long as I can remember. On the other hand, Bourbon and rye seems to be going through an amazing inflationary spiral… Heaven Hill bottled in bond was basically $20 forever, really ripping good bargain for that price, and it still sat on the shelves… They’ve added one year to the age statement and now they’re asking $79 a bottle everywhere. In fact, it has climbed from collecting dust on the bottom shelf to being on the top shelf or behind the counter! To each their own, capitalism will out, and I can’t see myself having a public meltdown in some form about whiskey pricing. Personally, my opinion on the whole American whiskey boom is it is based on fancy packaging, very dubious backstories, and lemming-like behavior driven by social media. P.T. Barnum’s dictum still holds water…I posted over here because I was looking up the Aberlour reviews again, and this page was one of the first things to pop up on Google, so I thought I would put my two cents in for the current situation. Thanks!

  13. Shawn says:

    Hi Taylor,
    Thanks for the honest and fantastic review and I would mostly agree with you. I have enjoyed Abunadh for a while and most recently tried batch 66. I will have to say, as much as the packing has changed, it’s has changed in taste. It’s certainly not creamy anymore and you don’t get the feeling of melting and explosion in your mouth. It is still flavoursome but has lost the characteristics of previous batches.
    If it continues like this, i personally would go back to square one!!

    1. Taylor says:

      Hi Shawn, appreciate the kind comments. Like any batched whisky, A’bunadh will change over time. Some changes may suit your fancy, others not so much. if you sense that things have gone south permanently, I’d encourage you to vote with your wallet and find something that performs to your expectations. Life is too short to spend drinking whisky you don’t enjoy. Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *