There are whispers and murmurings in the virtual realm of Malt, edging from the shadows, but there, nonetheless: murmurings that Malt has taken a turn to a darker, more negative tone. Possibly a new Malt policy, if you will. It seems critique has become confused with mud-slinging.

Why do you return to Malt on a regular basis? I ask that question more as a reader of Malt (which I myself am) rather than a contributor. Before Malt was relaunched in 2017, I was an avid follower and reader of both Mark and Jason, back in his Whisky Rover days. No doubt, like your good self, I returned for the no-nonsense, straight-talking and informative approach that often went against the collective grain, but felt refreshing for it. No bums were being kissed in the hope of more sample sets.

Somehow, I got asked to join the good ship Malt, and feel rather pleased for myself that I’m part of the team. But as a daily reader, I don’t feel that there has been a change of tone now that a few more bodies have been added to the collective. We all ascribe to the same policy of honest, critical reviews. To do anything less would undermine what we have built and what we are building.

Let me say that there is no Malt policy. All are us have free reign to write about what we want and in the way we want to. In fact, seeing some of my reviews published with the grammatical and spelling errors that were so glaringly obvious, I often wondered what Mark and Jason actually did as editors.

Granted, some of my own reviews haven’t been particularly glowing over recent times. The simple fact was that the whiskies in question just weren’t very good…and in some instances, were plain awful! That’s not negativity; it’s an honest appraisal. That being said, please don’t get the idea, either, that I take great delight in writing scathing reviews because I enjoy that about as much as I enjoy drinking crap whisky.

There is nothing in my reviews that I have any problem telling those in the industry face to face. I told Midleton Distillery’s Master Blender Billy Leighton that I didn’t like Jameson Signature. Jarlath Watson of Echlinville had to listen to me drone on about how I didn’t rate the Dunville’s Three Crowns. Probably not the way to win friends, but I simply come from the viewpoint of a customer. I have paid my money, so I shall take my shot.

The simple fact is that poor whiskies exist, and as people’s finances are at stake, they need to be highlighted. On the flip side though, where praise is due, praise is given.

One thing we definitely welcome, too, is interaction with the readership. We actively encourage you guys to comment on the reviews. To agree, to disagree, to add to our knowledge through your own; to make fun of Adam, and teach Alexandra how to spell.

So where is this rant of Wellsian proportions going? Well, it’s leading to Red Spot, the latest release from the distillation and maturation partnership of Midleton Distillery and Mitchell & Son’s Wine Merchants. Now, if indeed I wanted to head to the dark side, I could get all humpy that when it was released in Dublin last November, my invite to the party was mysteriously overlooked. I could have said, ‘Sod ’em, no freebie invite, no review’. Although I have inherited the jealouspathetic hashtag, I am actually neither jealous, nor pathetic….hopefully…and I don’t carry grudges (but I’d better be invited to the next fancy soiree!). So here is my Red Spot review, albeit months later than I’d hoped.

For a bit more history of Mitchell & Son’s, look back to my Green Spot Chateau Leoville Barton review so I don’t have to retread old ground.

The re-launch of Red Spot after a hiatus of nearly fifty years was one of the worst-kept secrets in Irish whiskey. Rumours of its revival abounded early in 2018, only to gather pace when the first iteration of the labelling appeared on the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s TTBonline.gov site. Finally, a November 2018 official release was announced, and the Interweb went into overdrive, especially regarding what the launch price might be.

I reckoned anything around £100 would be wishful thinking, and so was really rather pleasantly surprised when it was announced that it would retail for £95/€115 here in Ireland (yes, it’s quite an outlay, but when 3-4 year old whiskies sell for the same price it starts to seem more reasonable).

What, then, does your £95 get you? It gets you a triple-cask matured single pot still whiskey with the spirit matured in bourbon, sherry and marsala casks for at least 15 years before being vatted together. It’s bottled at 46%, and it is non chill filtered. Colouring has been sadly added for batch consistency.

I was given a generous sample by @Whiskey_JAC and also subsequently bought a bottle from Fairleys Wines for my bottle share club.

Red Spot Whiskey – review

Colour: Light auburn

On the nose: Equal parts sweet and fruity, as well as spicy and dusty. Stewed strawberries and blackberries ready for a crumble. Black cherry coulis. Vanilla Custard. Cinnamon & nutmeg, sawn wood and pepper. Some new leather, ripe mango and orange peel, with a very slight hint of mint in the background.

In the mouth: A rather soft but creamy and luscious arrival. Strawberry jam, stewed dark berries, and black licorice laces. Spice begins to build – cracked black pepper, cask char, nutmeg and ginger. Lovely biscuity quality to this. The finish is fairly long with crackling pot still spice, strawberry, licorice and a little aniseed.

Conclusions

Simply put: a really tasty and terribly easy-drinking drop from Mitchell & Son’s. This is a bottle that I imagine won’t hang about long in many whiskey cabinets. Well-crafted and balanced with the marsala casks thankfully used sparingly so as not to overpower the whole affair. I very much enjoyed it and will, finances allowing, buy another bottle—this time, all for myself. My only quibble really is the price – if this was £15 to £20 cheaper it would be knocking on an 8 but still it’s a worthy addition to the Spot line up. Looks like a trip to the dark side has been averted….for the time being.

Score: 7/10

(although I imagine Jason giving this a 6 because he’s awkward like that)

Lead image not taken by Phil.

CategoriesIrish
Phil
Phil

Hailing from the north coast of Ireland, my love of whisk(e)y started at an early age. As a baby, my mother would occasionally dip the nipples of my feeding bottle into whisky to get me to feed (not a joke!) and so a seed was planted. I started CauseWayCoast Whiskey Reviews in December 2016 after peer pressure from friends who frequently tell me that I am ‘fairly opinionated’ about whisky... amongst other things.

  1. Avatar
    thropplenoggin says:

    I’ve been a daily reader over the past 3-4 months. No complaints regarding ‘negativity’ here; just forthright critique of an industry losing its way and offering seriously poor value at times compared to wine or other spirits (Armagnac), due either to the investment brigade, the invisible hand, or the chutzpah of the ‘artisanal’ 3 y.o. ‘small batch’ merchants.

    Depressing times for bargain hunters, but I really appreciate the detailed, straight-talking, ling-form reviews, so refreshing from so much of the gurning YouTube blather.

  2. Avatar
    Jason says:

    £95 for a 15 year old?? Too rich for my blood by far. I can get a bottle of Lagavulin 16 AND a bottle of Glenfarclas 15 for that money!! I know ‘you pays your money, you makes your choice” but come on man. Any reasonable man would take my two over the Red Spot. I’m thinking the 7 score is a little on the high side – perhaps you had taken a wee sample of Red Bush beforehand to get your tastebuds goin??

    1. Phil
      Phil says:

      A quick search on Master of Malt & The Whisky Exchange turned up a few 15 year old scotches from the likes of Macallan, Highland Park, Bladnoch & Caol ila around the £95 to £100 mark so the pricing isn’t completely uncommon, although most brands seem to be hitting the £60-£75 bracket with a 15 year old these days.

      Irish whiskey still lacks the quantity of aged stock that Scotland has and so there will be a premium there. The massive level of interest in Irish releases means that companies can nearly name their price.

      It’s a really tasty drop but as I said probably £75 would be a more realistic ask.

      As too reasonable men choosing Lagavulin 16 or Glenfarclas 15….both good choices as long as you like scotch and in the laga’s case, you like a healthy dose of peat.

  3. Avatar
    djrobbo83 says:

    I think negativity is all too often confused with honesty, which is why malt review is my go review website before I purchase a bottle, not only have you saved me potential fortunes, but led me to some gems id otherwise may not have tried, Kilkerran 12 and jj Corry to name but two – thanks!

    This was a pretty hyped whiskey here in Ireland and it was purchases to me as a xmas gift, so I didn’t have the guilt of paying near £100 for it and it also put me in the rare position of having tried the whiskey before reading malts trusty review! It’s hard to argue with the score… it’s a really solid whiskey and a great example of a pot still with some interesting flavours coming through, but for me it falls short of Powers John Lane which for £40-50 has become a benchmark Irish Whiskey for me.

    1. Phil
      Phil says:

      Thanks for appreciating our work and glad we’ve been reliable guides so far.

      I have to agree about the Powers Johns Lane…it’s a super drop and excellent value.

      To me with the exception of the entry level Green Spot most of the Spot range is a little too expensive for what they are. All fine whiskies but it’s just that there will be other, cheaper alternatives out there that may offer similar or better experiences.

  4. Avatar
    TW says:

    I agree with Jason; £95 for this? It makes that 26 year Glen Scotia in another Malt review appear a bargain. Whilst we shouldn’t get too hung on price for this craft, I’d gurantee that it’s the main factor for the majority of regular whisky drinkers/buyers and I think we are still used to 15yo expressions being sub-£60. Therefore when the asking price is 50% higher than that, I find myself asking: “what’s the incentive?”…

    1. Phil
      Phil says:

      Thanks for commenting.

      As I replied to Jason part of the issue is lack of aged stock in Irish whiskey. There just isn’t the same quantity of stock in Ireland compared to Scotland.

      Also the level of interest in Irish whiskey, especially stateside means that prices for aged stock are creeping up.

      Chapel Gate Whiskey recently released the JJ Corry Flintlock at £95 for a 50cl of 16 year old whiskey.

      As the Cooley stocks have dried up expect to see Irish whiskey prices rise, especially for aged independent bottles.

  5. Avatar

    I have seen these releases around for a while but have been hesitant to try them. In SA they are also a bit more expensive than a standard Irish, but perhaps it is worth trying something new for a change.

  6. Avatar
    Welsh Toro says:

    I’ve been looking forward to this review on this platform precisely because I enjoy honest and robust reviewing. There are too many chummy reviews out there that do not echo my experience and I’ve been drinking whisky for a long time. I like the Yellow Spot and the Green Spot LB so anticipating a drop of this. Your review kind of sounds like I expected it and so, unfortunately, does the price. £75 is where it should be and let’s not compare it to Highland Park and Macallan 15 year prices because sensible people don’t play that game. It’s overpriced and that is regrettable but at least it sounds like a good one. Cheers.

  7. Avatar

    Thanks Phil, for the info on Irish Whiskies!
    Love to here about the new releases out of Ireland.
    It’s a great time to be a whisky drinker.
    I once smuggled 2 bottles of Green Spot from Dublin,
    into my bar before it was available in the states.
    Next time you are in California drop on by for a tasting.

Leave a Reply to djrobbo83 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *