Seedlip 42

I suppose I should really approach this whole thing by asking: what is the point of Seedlip Grove 42? This isn’t currently meant in a facetious manner, although I am not against such things. No, instead I am really trying to understand a few questions rolled into one general commercial sentiment.

Who is this sort of thing for? What is the situation where someone would want to spend £25 on a bottle of something that might not bring the flavour-riddled joys of traditional alcohol? Or, on a night out, a fiver for something that won’t have the right compounds to tickle a part of the brain that needs tickling? It’s a proper question. This is an unusual proposition.

We should park the conversation of people who have a serious problem with alcohol addiction; you can check out white sands rehab for the right help but that’s not what this article wants to be about. Nor do I deliberately want to be some booze-hound kicking a non-boozy drink. That isn’t the point, either: we’re seriously exploring anything that wants to step up to the plate and be taken seriously, which clearly Seedlip does want. This particular bottle today cost £25 – that is quite ambitious, and I wonder what the margins are on this considering there are no booze tax implications either?

You see, I’m also curious about this as I’ve already had one of these Seedlip drinks at a wedding in the summer, where I was driving. I chose it not because I thought – gosh I’d love a G&T but what can I have? But rather I thought, look I’m not some twattish drink driver, I’m on the soft stuff, I just don’t want to dump too much aspartame-filled CocaCola into my body, which is I dare say where many other dabblers in the non-alcoholic spirits sector come into contact with a product like this. Not as an alternative to alcohol – because we’re already prepared not to touch a drop – but as an alternative to soft drinks. Which were one time, quite frankly, a bit shit, and came in the form of a sugar-laden Britvic juice of some description. Christ, do they even still serve tomato juice in pubs as well? Tonic, orange juice, and tomato juice, that was one-time literally all you could drink if you were avoiding alcohol in pubs, and I assume once Brexit kicks in that’s precisely what we’ll return to.

Seedlip is a conscious attempt to carve out a new part of the market – one that I find ironic, even the logical conclusions to most of the drinks industry: which is to say, drinking as fashion. Was it always thus? A theory based on nothing at all, but perhaps some people want something that looks like a G&T, but isn’t one – exactly like I did. Perhaps it’s because they don’t want to feel left out socially, or a confidence thing. For me, at that summer wedding, I was merely interested to see what all the marketing… sorry, the fuss was about. But I can easily see the desire to not look like the bore of the group, miserably clutching his Coke Zero whilst everyone else is off their tits on Prosecco. Seedlip, perhaps, allows one to not suffer the judgement of boozehounds, which we are prone to do.

Anyway, given we are having a woke moment on Malt, and exploring low or non-alcoholic alternatives, I figured I’d get another one of these bottles and scrutinise it at home. There’s nothing I’d actually like more than to stumble across something new that brings joy. As I say: this site is a broad church, and we’re only here to gently kick products if they’re not giving flavour and value in our humble opinions. So with that in mind, I stumped up the cash to buy a bottle of Seedlip, one chosen totally at random, to see if this peculiar distilled non-alcoholic drink was any good.

Seedlip 42

Seedlip Grove 42 – Review

On the nose: hints of lemon and lime, with traces of cucumber. Not unpleasant in and of itself. But it really doesn’t give more than still lemonade.

In the mouth: Hideous. Not only is there a thin texture that’s barely more than water – which gives no pleasing sensations at all – but there’s just boring mild acidity with nothing to balance it out. Little more than cucumber, watermelon, grapefruit and limes. Slightly soapy, too.


This is expensive and relatively flavourless. Let’s be honest, that’s all I can say. If this is the future, it’s a dystopian one where society isn’t allowed fun… I jest, slightly. I really don’t like being mean about products, contrary to what some people might think – just look over my last year of reviews and I seldom dip below 5 and often go as high as 9, because I only like to talk about things that might interest me.

But there’s no pleasure in this. No complex molecules darting across my tongue, trigger flavour receptors and the likes – no joy. No texture. This is not the non-alcoholic delight I was hoping for, even approaching it with low standards in mind.

I later tried it with tonic, and that’s where the real crime kicked in. As a mixer, you couldn’t taste a thing of the spirit itself – if indeed spirit is the right word. Imagine paying a fiver or more for a shot in a bar when you could have the same experience from a lemonade. In fact, that’s really my point: there’s nothing here that you couldn’t get from lemonade at a fraction of the price. If you wanted to feel like you were having something fancy, why not a craft lemonade of some description? I’m sure there’s a cottage industry of lemon groves planted according to terroir

People in bars, exposed to quite relentless marketing from deep-pocketed corporations, will no doubt buy Seedlip, for the other choice is fizzy pop. Other brands are piling into this sector. They will most definitely be throwing money at on-trade marketing, bars and the likes, rather than drinking at home – because you’d have to be as silly as me to actually buy a bottle at home. This is not for connoisseurs and does that mean people like you and me won’t find any fun in this sector?

This is, perhaps, going back to my feeling that summer evening of wanting to be seen with a drink that isn’t tap water or a Coke Zero – and perhaps feeling psychologically like one is doing something slightly fancier too. There’s only so much elegance a can of coke can bring in life, but at least it costs less than a quid to have acids burning up stomach lining.

Does this stop people drinking booze? Does this yield health benefits? I don’t know, but I don’t think so because as I have suggested, this is really going to be for those who were never going to drink on a night out in the first place. These are broad questions, based on little evidence, and I am perhaps the worst person to explore it. All I am trying to do is answer that perennial Malt question: does a product connect flavour with price.

In this case, it is a firm no.

But ultimately, I’m not really sure who this is for, other than some sales and marketing department: it enables a company to add a robust string to the Corporate Social Responsibility bow whilst they rain down arrows of cheap booze across in some other corner of the globe. As something that is so pricey, I imagine this milks the same breed of cash cow that has people paying for expensive bottled water.

Oh well. I am now £25 out of pocket. What’s that about a fool and his money?

I look to our scoring bands and can only be truthful to the system. It isn’t ‘horrid’ like the legendarily bad Fujikai 10. But…

Score: 2/10

Note I: as an aside, this is an excellent article on Seedlip with a slightly different approach.

Note II: I have since poured the rest of the bottle down the sink. Honestly, that’s what I did. Not being a rebel, I just got rid of it.


  1. Nice article. As far as “soft” drinks go, this doubles with articles I’ve read in relation to sports (ie sugar) drinks. The answer to both is probably water – but even an inclination towards that can be cynically exploited. £25, though. Have you considered whisky, perchance? I understand it’s making somewhat of a comeback and is quite popular around my neck of the woods.

  2. PBMichiganWolverine says:

    I actually bought all three for my wife over the holidays. My wife doesn’t drink—-she’s severely allergic to alcohol. The first time she had alcohol 20 years ago (only one cocktail), she was hospitalized. She the got diagnosed as not being able to consume alcohol, even the slightest amount.

    So—I bought all three of these for her ( Spice, Garden, Grove). Out of all the guests that tried it, no one…not a single one liked it, except for her ( because she’s never had the real thing I guess). Everyone thought it was bottled flavored water. I made cocktails using this, with recipes from the website. But my wife loved though…enough for her to buy another set. The only other guests that did like it were the preteens ( ages 11-14). These kids weren’t drinking soda because of high sugar, but they liked this.

    So…I guess “who’s it meant for”…I can only think of people that have never have had alcohol even in the slightest bit?

    1. John says:

      Hi PB, like you and your guests, I didn’t like any of the 3. They mostly tasted like liquid salad to me. But mixed with tonic water? It’s better. But vodka would have to be the tastiest spirit in the world for me to ever crave for any of these.

    2. Mark says:

      Thanks for sharing that.

      And interesting that it’s appealing to pre-teens. I’d say that’s hardly the image the creators were after!

    1. Mark says:

      Thanks, Chris. Yes, that’s the thing: there are already so many great options already… I’m sure it was a no-brainer for Diageo.

  3. Dave says:

    Hi Mark

    I don’t think people would spend £25 on something which “might not bring the flavour-riddled joys of traditional alcohol”, but more likely spend £25 on something that they hope WILL bring the flavour-riddled joys of traditional alcohol, which is where the bottle design appears to be a success for Seedlip (maybe the ‘only’ success). I certainly bought it, just the once, for that very reason. Nor will most people, I believe, have the knowledge that it doesn’t have the right compounds to mimic alcohol, they will simply be swayed by the bottle telling them that it’s a non-alcoholic spirit, and presume that it does.

    Also, without meaning to pick the article apart, I’m not sure it’s going to be for someone on a night out who wants a drink that ‘looks’ like a g&t for surely, as gin is a clear spirit, no one is going to know what’s in the glass, so they may as well just have a tonic. Unless it’s being served at the bar in front of friends, in which case someone will surely say ‘what the hell is that?’ and then the cats out of the bag!

    Like you, I’m confused who this is for. All I can conclude is that it’s for people that love the taste of alcohol, and who, for whatever reason, can’t drink it. People that want to replicate the taste of an alcoholic drink but without the alcohol. Unfortunately, in this respect, it fails in every way.

    I applaud anyone for trying to achieve a non-alcoholic spirit that tastes like alcohol though. I feel there is definitely a market for it, but fear that it’s an impossible task.

    Cheers, all the best


    1. Mark says:

      Thanks for the comment, Dave. The “looks like a G&T” part came because of the way it’s served in bars or hotels; parts of the on-trade use it like a gin replacement, and serve it in those big bulbous glasses that gin is served in; and served with tonic. It looks like you’ve got a trendy G&T basically.

    2. Nyx says:

      I think you would have to use something other than water as a base. Not sure what that could be. Saw this brand used in a mocktail but thought it was more like bitters or a shrub.

      This review was on point. I just saved money. 🙂 I am just on the lookout out for unusual mixers.

      If I could not drink, Coke Zero is fine. Their salad forest flavor might work as a splash in it. But then again, it was written above that it has no taste as a mixer. Cute bottle though. Love squirrels.

      1. Mark says:

        Thanks, Nix. Funnily enough Coke Zero is my go-to non-alcoholic drink.

        Your note about scrubs in the other comment – no, I’ve not heard of that (unless it’s another word for something). What is it?

  4. Graham says:


    Thanks for this review; thanks because you addressed exactly what I was wondering. Can this actually be tasty enough to justify the price tag? So thanks for taking the hit and buying the Emperor’s New Booze.

    I didn’t drink during 2018 and opted for classics like lime cordial and soda and fresh orange and lemonade before discovering kombucha. The kombucha was a great alternative to alcohol because the fermentation created a complex flavour; it was not sweet and the sour flavours made it a great slow sipper. It’s still not that common in bars unfortunately.

    1. Mark says:

      Hi Graham. What a great call with kombucha! You’ve inspired me to buy a few bottles to see how I get on. Could be the perfect non-alcohol alternative for people who actually like flavour.

  5. Ann B says:

    With various natural products of all kinds you can produce better flavors, even boiled or cold marinated in water. Costs almost nothing and is much better. They only catch me once and never again !!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *