Compass Box Double Single & Enlightenment

Take a look at the top-selling blends and you will quickly realise that Transparency has got nothing to do with their success, popularity or loyalty. I’m not talking Terroir here, even though it has superseded transparency as an all-encompassing term. I’m talking strictly blends and the information on the components of the blend.

Now, take a look at your own whisky collection. Pick the top blends from your stash and check how many of them provide you with information other than marketing and the mandatory technical information? What! You don’t blend you say? If you don’t blend then you are doing yourself a great disservice. Now, for those of you who do, check how many of the same producers have detailed information about their blends on the bottle or their website? I guess the answer to both would be not as much to none. But are these good whiskies? I guess the answer would be a certain yes. Given that as it may, are there enough of us actively seeking this kind of information for the producers to actually care? Does this information make it a better whisky? In my book, not necessarily. This brings me to Compass Box and its founder John Glaser.

Compass Box is a Boutique blending house and has successfully premiumised blends, in what is largely a mass market category. By premiumising, I mean not just attractive livery and story telling (which they do very well), but also the use of excellent malt and grain components in the build. It was John’s conviction that blends if (and that’s a big if) constructed well can be placed on the same pedestal as a good single malt. Something we would all agree on.

In 2015, he locked horns with the SWA & EU and this time it was on transparency. Previously he got a rap on his knuckles from the SWA for using inner staves (french oak) in the maturation of Spice Tree. Coming back to 2015, regulations prohibited Compass Box or any other producer to share age statements of the various whisky components used in their blends. Enlightenment was released as a response to SWA & EU’s stance and followed this up with a Scotch Whisky Transparency campaign, which was joined by Bruichladdich as well. I signed up too. But no, the floodgates of transparency were not raised. So, the regulation still stands and below is the response received from Compass Box to all those who signed up.

‘As you may be aware, despite our best efforts to change the UK & EU laws through our Scotch Whisky Transparency campaign, currently the only way for us to share information about the age of the component whiskies used in our blends is in response to a direct request for information from an interested party. Moreover, to ensure full compliance with the relevant regulations we are asking those individuals we share this information with to treat the information as being for their eyes only. Specifically we ask that you please do not use the age information provided below in any promotional format or share it in a public forum with others (via blogs, tweets, facebook posts etc.)This will help avoid any claims being made that Compass Box are trying to ‘promote’ the ages of our whiskies through third parties by sharing the information with them in the hope that they will share it with others. This is not our aim.’

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

Thankfully, those confrontational campaign days are long a thing of the past and Compass Box have moved on to what they do best i.e. craft good blends.

On to the review, the Enlightenment is a limited edition malt blend of Clynelish (48.2%) a Compass Box staple, Glentauchers (36.7%), Balblair (10.8%) and Mortlach (4.3%). All malts were matured in First-fill bourbon casks with the exception of Mortlach which was matured in a rejuvenated bourbon cask. 5992 bottles were released at 46% abv in 2016. This has sold out since then. I paid £80 for it.

Moving on to the Double Single, the idea of creating a blended whisky from just two components came from a session with Duncan Elphick and Tatsuya Minagawa of the famous Highlander Inn on Speyside in 2003. In 2010 as a part of Compass Box 10th anniversary celebrations they brought back Double Single which was originally launched as a small one-off expression in 2004. The original recipe consisted of two whiskies,18 yo single malt from the Glen Elgin distillery (76% vatting) combined with a single cask of 21 yo grain from Port Dundas (24% vatting) which was released at 53.3%. For the third edition which I’m reviewing the Port Dundas was replaced by Girvan. The vatting ratios were tweaked to 72% & 28% respectively. Both have received re-charred ex-bourbon barrel maturation and was released at 46% abv with an outrun of 5838 bottles in 2017. It is still available at HTFW for £139.95 and at Nickolls & Perks for £143.95 if you are feeling particularly rich. I received this bottle as a generous gift from my dear friend Prem Raheja.

Compass Box Whiskies

Compass Box Double Single – review

Colour: Gold.

On the nose: Very fresh. Watermelon, sweet lime followed by red and green apple crumble. Very fruity and sweet. The grain makes its presence felt with vanilla and a boiled confectionery note. A little rest brings out rum and raisins. Water brings out more citrusy notes of sweet lime and gooseberry. Also highlights a touch of wood char. But it’s primarily the Glen Elgin singing which cannot be a bad thing.

In the mouth: Vanilla, honey and warm baking spices. It is not as fruit forward as the nose. Custard, lemon tart, dried rose petals and a rum like mouthfeel. The grain is a bit more assertive here. There is the fruity element but in the background. On the mid palate there is a bitter woody note presumably from the recharred cask which extends to the back of the throat. Water makes it vegetal even though it reduces the bitterness. I would avoid dilution. Overall development is very subdued and the finish is dry and woody.

Score: 5/10

Compass Box Enlightenment – review

Colour: Pale gold.

On the nose: Very fruity. Musk melons, overripe plums, red apples. Green apples and pears drizzled with honey and cinnamon. Dusty vanilla and unsurprisingly, beeswax. With a little rest there are subtle sweet earthy notes of Mukhvas which is a typical Indian mouth freshener and digestive made from toasted fennel seeds, aniseed, split cilantro seeds and dill seeds. Chocolate and orange waft fleetingly from the glass. No significant improvement with water.

In the mouth: Follows the nose in perfect sync. A walk in a fruit orchard with foliage et all. Red and green fruit puree in a glass with baking spices. The waxy Clynelish character is a lot subdued on the palate. The mouthfeel is thin and it skids across the mid-palate. With a little rest, mild bitter oak and spices keep the sweetness in check. Water murders the composition. Highly avoidable. The finish drops off a cliff.

Score: 6/10


Well, the Double Single is no Simon & Garfunkel. The nose sings much better than the palate. On the palate, the delivery was rather straightforward. I have revisited this whisky on five occasions and each time it begins on a very promising note and then flatlines as you give it more time. It’s all well rounded and easily quaffable. But it lacked the exuberance of the nose. There isn’t a lot of complexity or layers. For me the duet was sans the “Wow” factor especially when you consider the princely sum of £145. That is a lot of money for any type of whisky in my opinion, irrespective of its composition. At that level you are rubbing shoulders with the likes of Johnnie Walker Blue Label (which I’m not a fan of) minus the bragging rights.

Enlightenment on the other hand is a fun playful blend. Very fresh and refreshing. Nose and palate follow each other. I liked the way it evolved in the glass, the progression moving from fruit to earthy spices and bitter oak. In that sense it does offer more than the Double Single at a much affordable price point. A perfect sundowner on the rocks.

Both the blends are quite similar in their profiles. Fruit forward with spice and honey. I can see why these would be immensely likeable. These are “safe” compositions designed for what blends usually aim to be crowd pleasers. And there is nothing wrong with that at all. After all, whisky is meant for the masses. In the case of Double Single, I’m not too sure of the premise that the use of just two high quality components has resulted in more complexity. I found Enlightenment to have an edge over it which has four malts in the mix. And its hardly surprising given their pedigree. But it’s not four vs two or two hundred. I just don’t think there is a formula for complexity, yet.

Compass Box has come under criticism here on Malt and in the whiskyverse. Overpriced-bling-style-over-substance. Some of it is not entirely unwarranted especially on the pricing, over reliance on storytelling etc. Having said that I still find their core range a very solid offering at an accessible price point. If that makes me sound like a fan boy then so be it. But then I’m as much of a fan boy of Chorlton Whisky and North Star Spirits and on the transparency ranking (if there was one) both would score much lower (not faulting them for that) than Compass Box. But do they consistently release stellar whiskies even though we will not know anything more about the juice beyond what is printed on the label? Ok don’t get me wrong. I’m not pro-ambiguity. Far from it! But for me transparency is good to have rather than a must have. And I cannot see myself overreaching in that sense. Case in point – The Spaniard. I know the recipe but it didn’t float my boat. I found it rather dull and I think it is the weakest expression in the core range. And I will extend this to the recent madness around Terroir as well. Underlying intent (good or bad) around all these buzz words is also to extract more from your wallet. But finally the juice has to do the talking.

Now my final two bits. In my formative audio engineering days I voraciously read technical papers and every high end equipment review I could lay my hands on. So, consumed I was with audio geekery that went into audio and music production that I could discuss topics like acoustics, frequencies, phase, imaging, timbre, crossovers, harmonic distortion, solid state vs tubes, class A vs class D and all the rest of it till the cows came home. Until one day it dawned up on me that I had stopped listening to the music! Passion at times overrides objectivity and robs us of the simple pleasures of life. Sometimes we need to put aside our critical listening syndrome and start enjoying the music. After all, there is music in whisky as well.


Nikkhil or Nik as he is usually summoned lives in Mumbai, India. He is currently multi-tasking between his day job as Head-Broadcast Technology with a very popular television music network and distance learning Brewing & Distilling at Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh. Apart from writing for his own blog Whiskyflu he offers free spell check and typo services to other whisky bloggers. He is also an avid cyclist and blends whisky in his free time. You can follow him on Twitter or Instagram.

  1. Graham says:


    Great debut on Malt and nice to get a new perspective and tasting notes on Compass Box. I’m disappointed for Compass Box with these scores. I have always enjoyed the Hedonism as a delicious easy drinker and a great bottle to take to a party as it always sparks interest and gets polished off quickly. The Spaniard is definitely a crowd pleaser but a little simple for established whisky drinkers perhaps. I also tried the Transistor developed for Brewdog to compliment the Punk IPA, which it probably did being a bit bland and trading off an old reputation. I’ve hankered for their more exclusive blends but balked at the price I’m certain to avoid them now. All fur coat and no knickers and my Granny would say.

    1. Nikkhil says:

      Hi Graham,

      Thank you for your kind words. You are absolutely spot on about Hedonism and I would stretch that to the entire core range. My personal favourites have been Flaming Heart, Great King St Artist Blend, Asyla, Spice Tree and Hedonism. Honestly ever since they started “limited edition” pricing shot through the roof. My last purchase was the Enlightenment. I haven’t bothered to make any other since then. I’ve not tried the Transistor but I get what you mean. They probably need to shake up a few things in the mix and certainly look at the pricing factor. I would agree with your Granny.

      Thank you for reading.

      Stay safe!

  2. PBMichiganWolverine says:

    Great article, especially that last paragraph on over-passion.

    Personally, CB was one of my favorites blenders with the amazing limited releases and affordable, and very good, core range. I feel as if it’s lost some luster, for me at least, because of what I interpreted their approach of late as hyped marketing. Take Tobias for example: the juice itself is stellar, but why over-market it by partnering with an art gallery and buying rights to publish that photo? I’m sure the liquid would’ve been just as stellar, but cheaper and affordable, without that picture licensing.

    1. Nikkhil says:

      Hi Wolverine,

      Thank you for the kind words. I’m glad you liked the review. I agree with your assessment on the likes of Tobias and some of the other limited edition releases. Over reliance on storytelling has been off putting. But increasingly we find ourselves paying more for the label than the juice. Slap the words “limited edition” and you can get away with almost anything. And almost invariably all of this will come at a cost which is simply not justifiable and in the long run does more harm to the brand than good. Yes I still like the core CB range but that’s about it. Thankfully we are all spoilt for choice now as far as IBs are concerned and many offer great value at a significantly lower entry point.

      Thank you for reading.

      Stay safe!

  3. Ira says:

    Good review. Unfortunately for us in the U.S. good IBs are very, very hard to find, so CB was an appealing option for a while. That is, until, they became obsessed with marketing and luxury-market pricing. My question, which I’ve floated elsewhere is whether this new marketing-driven strategy was the game plan all along after CB got sufficiently big, or whether it is something mandated by Glaser’s new partners, Bacardi.

    1. Nikkhil says:

      Hi Ira,

      Thank you Ira. I’m glad you liked the review. Almost everybody I know who started of liking CB and Glaser’s transparency drive have begun to question the underlying intent. I would still like to give him the benefit of the doubt. I would like to believe that its post Bacardi. Remember what they did to BOX? That was completely out of character and I still can’t imagine that John let it happen. Anyway stick to the core range is what I would suggest.

      Stay safe!

  4. John says:

    Welcome to the fold, Nikkhil!

    Great first article and great first brand to cover. I’ve always been a fan of CB due to their advocacy for transparency. But the quality of their whisky has been shaky as of late. Is it due to Bacardi buying in? Are they having a harder time sourcing good whisky? Is JG losing his touch? Sad questions to ask about a brand I used to love a lot.

    1. Nikkhil says:

      Thank you for your kind words John. Ira in the comment above had the same doubt and my answer would be the same as well. I think it has Bacardi written all over it. Tobias & The Angel had a £450 price tag! Hedonism, The Muse £240, Rogues’ Banquet £190 and so on. I also don’t see these bottle flying off the shelves. Don’t think this could be because of sourcing. They are still very Clynelish-Caol Ila heavy after all. JG losing his touch? Don’t know about that but in the bargain he has certainly lost a bit of credibility which is a lot worse and in my opinion extremely difficult to repair. I still sip and savour some of the core range bottles I have, to remind me of the CB I once knew and loved.

      Stay safe!

  5. Carissa says:

    Congratulations Nik!! Love your debut post which clearly has struck a chord with readers.
    Agree completely with all your observations.

    My favourite CB remains Phenomenology. Yes it is pricey however it truly was remarkable in how it consistently elicited a diverse range of reactions revealing palate preferences of the imbiber.

    PS Spell check / typo services much appreciated. 🙂

    1. Nik says:

      Thank you so much Carissa for stopping by and for your kind words. Phenomenology is a good drop indeed. I’m looking forward to your Chorlton reviews.

      Spell check/typo services shall continue but I’m finding it difficult to keep it free given the lockdown. Some barter perhaps?

  6. Geoff says:

    Interesting take on these two. I haven’t seen either in my market, but based on this I’m not sure I’d feel the need to buy either if I came across them.

    I tend to agree with your style-over-substance point. I think we give Compass Box a bit of a free pass at times. Partly because they pioneered the “quality blended malt,” and partly because they’re so widely praised by others and the community. Truth be told, I find many of their releases to be rather average whiskies in pretty bottles. Good one, Nikkhil!


    1. Nik says:

      Thanks Geoff. And I agree with you. The Enlightenment is good no doubt. And so were the initial core range expressions. But then the storytelling took over with limited editions and along with that the prices. That’s when they lost the plot. Double Single itself was £150. That’s a lot of money and I’m glad I got it as a gift. I would be very disappointed if I had spent that kind of money for an average delivery in a pretty bottle.

      Thanks for reading.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *