To quote a fellow chronic malcontent, “Please, please, please, let me get what I want.”

And what is that, exactly? In whiskey terms: it’s a single barrel, bottled without dilution or filtration. For those of us who don’t get to roam rickhouses using a whiskey thief to sample this or that barrel, being able to taste the liquid as close to the way it came out of the cask allows us to live that dream in a microcosmic way. There’s also the added bonus of potential “off-profile” barrels, those weird and wonderful oddities that take on aromas and flavors not typically associated with their respective distilleries.

I’m not alone in my preference for this format, based on the voracious hunger for this type of whiskey and the associated scarcity of such bottles when they do become available. Despite this clear demand (at least from our hyper-enthusiastic niche of the audience), widely available retail releases of barrel proof single barrels are rare among the large Kentucky bourbon distilleries. We get cask strength, and we get single barrels, but (outside of store picks) we seldom see the overlap of those two circles in the Venn diagram.

Running down the list: Jim Beam has the Jim Beam Single Barrel, diluted down to 95 proof (47.5% ABV), Booker’s small batch at barrel proof, and Baker’s Single Barrel at a standard 107 proof, but not a barrel proof single barrel expression.

From Buffalo Trace we’ve got Blanton’s single barrel releases, at a standard 93 proof (46.5%). Those fortunate to live overseas may find the Blanton’s Straight From the Barrel, though this is not a standard offering here in the U.S. (yet). There’s E.H. Taylor Single Barrel (bottled-in-bond at 100 proof) and E.H. Taylor Barrel Proof, which is a small batch. Sazerac sibling Barton 1792 gives us a Single Barrel, and a “Full Proof,” but not a full proof single barrel.

Heaven Hill offers us Henry McKenna Single Barrel, though this is at the stipulated Bottled-in-Bond strength of 100 proof (55% ABV). There’s also the Evan Williams Single Barrel, coming to us at the even lower strength of 86.6 proof (43.3% ABV). On the barrel proof side, both Elijah Craig and Larceny have entrants in the category. Though they’re solid quality products, they are once again presented in batch format.

Four Roses has the retail Single Barrel offering at a standard 100 proof (50% ABV). While store picks of the Single Barrel expression are bottled at full strength, these are increasingly difficult to lay hands on for those of us unable to constantly monitor social media for news of these releases.

Wild Turkey gives us Russell’s Reserve Single Barrels at a standard 55%, as well as a batched cask strength release in the form of Rare Breed. Only Single Cask Nation has been able to bottle undiluted single barrel Wild Turkey.

Brown-Forman pleased fans early this year when they announced that they’d be relaunching the Old Forester single barrel program to include a barrel strength option (in addition to 100 proof) to replace the prior 90 proof offering. I’ve yet to lay hands on one of the new format bottlings, but it’s right up toward the top of the shopping list.

I ruminated on all this as I pondered the subject of today’s review. This is partly because this distillery has always eschewed the single barrel format with a conviction bordering on religiosity. However, a recent thaw has resulted in green shoots of hope that good things could be in store. I’m speaking, o­­f course, about Maker’s Mark.

After nearly seven decades of being essentially a single-product brand, 2010 saw the release of an innovative new finished bourbon. Dubbed “46,” this became the basis for the Maker’s Mark Private Select program (kindly refer to that review for a potted history of the distillery and brand).

My recent chat with Brian Haara about all things Maker’s turned up a few recurring themes: the distillery’s emphasis on consistency (resulting in policies of rickhouse rotation and batching), the relatively restrained portfolio (in terms of number of expressions therein), and their fans’ cravings for previously-unavailable styles of Maker’s including, naturally, a single barrel variant.

Another thing that continued to echo in my head was how the brand has fallen out of favor with the whiskey “cool kids.” The Insta-folks who accessorize their bourbon with sports cars and Rolexes and automatic weapons seem to studiously avoid Maker’s Mark in comparison with hysterically-hyped bottles from the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection and Weller. Could the release of a single barrel at full strength reinvigorate this brand?

Until parent company Jim Beam finds a way to Make Maker’s Fashionable Again™, we’ll be left enjoying the current range of whiskey from the distillery which is – just between us – consistently very good. Hoping to keep a streak of highly enjoyable whiskey going, today I’ll be sampling a recent batch of the Cask Strength expression.

Maker’s Cask Strength is bottled at 108 to 114 proof, given the barrel entry proof of 110 and the natural rises and falls that occur depending on temperature and humidity. The mash bill is the Maker’s standard 70% corn, 16% red winter wheat, 14% barley. This particular bottle is from is batch # 20-02, brought to us at 110.4 proof (55.2% ABV). Retail price for this is $40, but I picked up a bottle for $37.

Maker’s Mark Cask Strength – Review

Color: Orange-hued copper.

On the nose: Immediately expressive, with a balanced but forceful mix of fruit and wood. On the fruit side, there is an exuberant cherry note as well as the piquant, oily aroma of orange peel. More sniffing reveals this is actually packed with citrus: key lime and grapefruit make appearances, as does a tart aroma of gooseberries. The wood is not a flabby vanilla overlay, but rather a tannic, sharp, yet sweet and well-integrated note of oak. With some time in the glass, this takes on spicy notes of anise as well as a mineralic nuance of limestone.

In the mouth: Starts with a reprise of the nose’s pert limestone note, as well as some elements of the astringent wood. This calms down as it moves towards the top of the tongue, where some creamily nutty flavors yield suddenly to the tannic oaky notes singing out once again. Before this lapses over into woody bitterness, though, there are the perfect balancing notes of citrus and stone fruit, as well as the light sweetness of confectioners’ sugar. A subtle, understated finish is marked by earthy flavors of dried tobacco leaf, some dry old leather, and a radiant heat, evidence of the higher bottling proof of this expression.

Conclusions

Outstanding bourbon, and even more so for the money, especially compared with the competition. This brings all the aromas, textures, and flavors that accompany the other full proof bottlings above, yet it sits on the shelves at a moderate discount to the SRP for those expressions, and a meaningful discount for the marked-up prices at which they’re more frequently found.

Going back to the initial conceit of this review: while this isn’t my platonic ideal, it offers excellent value for the money and has earned its place in my regular rotation of go-to bourbons. I’m happy to have found it, and just as happy to have found another rebuke to anyone who sleeps on Maker’s Mark.

Score: 8/10

CategoriesAmerican
Taylor
Taylor

Taylor's a native of Chicago. After heading to university in Scotland, he graduated from drinking Whyte & Mackay and Coke to neat single malts. He's also a keen fan of Japanese whisky, having visited the country regularly over the last several years, where he was able to assemble a decent collection before prices went batty.

  1. John
    John says:

    Great insight, Taylor. Maker’s Mark seem to be the… most stubborn of the brands? I’m pretty sure they have enough stock to bottle releases with age statements but they never do. Though I think the small market of Maker’s Mark collectors is often forgotten. I used to see a lot of collectible bottles such as ones with sports and seasonal themes.

    1. Taylor
      Taylor says:

      John, thanks much. Indeed, compared with the slavish devotion of fans to brands like Weller, Maker’s seems to languish. While it feels slightly unfair, in practice it means we can enjoy it any time we please, rather than having to hunt it down or pay a premium. For that, at least, I’ll raise a glass and say “Cheers!”

  2. Avatar
    Carlton says:

    Glad to see Maker’s receiving some attention. For several reasons (still design, yeast strain, distillation and barrel-entry proofs), they are the closest thing to a Stitzel-Weller product on the market today.

    1. Taylor
      Taylor says:

      Thanks Carlton, and well-noted. All those who chase ersatz Stitzel-Weller substitutes (which, as you point out, have little in common with their forebears beyond the mash bill) would do well to open their eyes to the gems hidden in plain sight. Cheers!

  3. Avatar
    Apple Wino says:

    I got a bottle of the 19-02 batch and was not impressed at first. The nose and palate seemed completely shut down. I waited a couple weeks and still hoped for the best, but there was no improvement. Even a friend who loves Maker’s picked it as his least favorite from McKenna SiB, Larceny BP, and Elijah Craig BP. But then I added a few drops of water and the Maker’s totally blossomed and really turned out to be wonderful. I’m not sure I ever had a whiskey transform so dramatically, especially a bourbon.

    Thanks for another informative review!

    1. Taylor
      Taylor says:

      Apple Wino, thanks for the comments! So many factors at play here: batch variation, high proof, and even the subtle changes that happen as a bottle is open for a while. As always, I counsel patience, and am glad to hear that it paid off in your case. Cheers!

  4. Avatar
    Greg B. says:

    Interesting review, Taylor, and I enjoyed the video portion as well as your written thoughts. I take it that there is no age statement associated with this? Do we know what age other Maker’s expressions are bottled at?

    I found your comments on how Maker’s has fallen out of fashion both interesting and on the mark (pardon the pun). I know that I have had it several times on my shelf but find myself overlooking it now when I am in the market for a new bottle of something. It seems not so much to have a poor image as it does to have not much image at all. Strange. Perhaps this will help rebuild that. Hopefully it will reach my area soon.

    As an aside, I noticed in the video when you were nosing it that it seemed you had your mouth tightly shut. Years ago a wine and spirits I respected – perhaps the best one I ever encountered – advised me to open my mouth for part of a nosing and to gently breathe in through the mouth as well. When I did that, I detected different things from when the mouth was closed. I’m sure you were likely already aware of this but if not, it might be worth trying.

    Thanks for this. I always look forward to your contributions here.

    1. Taylor
      Taylor says:

      Greg, I’ll refer you to my interview with Brian Haara, who mentioned that Maker’s has said the whiskey is bottled at around eight years of age. I appreciate your kind words and continued support. Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *