American Idiot: Musings of a Bourbon Novice

Let’s be straight: I cannot recall ever drinking a bourbon whiskey that was not masked by some sweet cocktail ingredients.

I spent my student years demolishing Jack Daniels in most unhealthy fashion (not even a bourbon I know that much) and the familiar smell of JD really repulses me now. As a non-bourbon drinker there appear to be relatively limited attempts to win me over.  A modest selection in supermarkets is sold entirely by price point. I’ve never browsed a whisky shop and had a bourbon suggested by the staff.

I recently travelled through a UK airport on a domestic flight and  – whilst the retail assistant was at pains to point out that none of the whisky for sale was available to domestic travellers post-Brexit – they were at a loss when I asked about bourbon.  “What about American whiskey in general?” I asked. “We have some Jack Daniels,” came the reply.

I do know that there is a growing bourbon scene in the UK, but it is significantly more niche that something like rum.  I know there is a UK Bourbon club, or something similarly named, and I imagine I’m only one degree of separation from some real connoisseurs.  Outside of the supermarket staples, the UK prices appear off-putting for an ignorant guy like me who does not know his “West Texas Wild-Pig” from his “Minnesota Mile-Maker.”

Another thing holding me back from venturing into the bourbon scene was the feeling that there is so much to know and experience with Scotch that I never really had any spare bandwidth to devote to world whiskies in general or bourbon to be specific. But, when Taylor offered reciprocity in a sample share, I knew his bourbon picks would be a great starting point.

Perhaps what I’m getting at is: don’t expect any blazing insight or deep dives from here on; but hopefully for Scotch drinkers who, like me, have not tried bourbons the experience below might be of interest.

I am sorry to admit I have not even read the Malt articles about these picks. I might just wait until publication of thisarticle before reading them!  Each one of these has been properly reviewed by Taylor and is linked next to the notes.

I’m sure this will qualify for my shortest article on Malt ever!

Maker’s Mark – Cask strength Batch #18-02 – Review

110.9 proof (55.45% ABV); previously reviewed by Taylor here.

Colour: I’m going to mention this only once as the samples are indistinguishable from each other in this regard.  Dark copper or deep chestnut.

On the nose: Spirty cereal sweetness, noses like a well-aged grain Scotch whisky, some nail varnish, fresh spray paint, followed loads of fresh wood spice, and the stone of a peach.

In the mouth: Very sweet, almost plastic-like spirit, chewing on a traditional wooden pencil, Trebor Extra Strong Mints, the second pass after tongue anaesthesia is much more mellow, peppery spices and the finish is long oily and intriguing.

Henry McKenna Single Barrel 10 Years Old Bottled in Bond – Review  

50% ABV (100 proof); Taylor’s take can be found here.

On the nose: Not nearly as sweet, punchy spirit hit, but also much smoother, furniture polish, mineral oil, camphor, blossom honey, caramel and hot motorbike engines.

In the mouth: Like the nose, less sweet, less texture than the Maker’s Mark, nectarine and orange marmalade giving a bittersweet edge, really peppery spice, chilli sugar syrup, dark chocolate mints, and chewing on a finished ice lolly stick.

Elijah Craig Barrel Proof 12 years old Batch #B519 – Review

122.2 Proof (61.1% ABV); Taylor provided his thoughts on a prior batch.

On the nose: Creamed corn, toasted vanilla marshmallows, a bright fruitiness, honeydew melon rind, dry woodland, sawdust, a touch of aniseed.

In the mouth: So much smoother despite the proof. Menthol spirit, old theatres with dusty carpets, none of the fruit I was expecting from the nose.

Peerless “Apple Pie” Rye – Review

Barrel #150822106 selected by Justins’ House of Bourbon. 114.2 Proof (57.1% ABV).Taylor reviewed this and the sister bourbon barrel previously.

On the nose: Dry ethanol, artificial vanilla, no sweet apple pie for sure, more exploration gives Flumps and foam shrimps, school gym hall, scout huts and other worn wood floors, some savoury umami notes

In the mouth: French polisher’s workshop, savoury spices like smoked paprika, earthy flamed cinnamon powder, loads of turmeric, saffron, fresh chilli on the finish.

Peerless “Burnt Ends” Bourbon – Review

Barrel #16023104 selected by Justin’s House of Bourbon 109.7 Proof (54.85% ABV)

On the nose: Prominent vanilla, a meatiness, cask char, BBQ firelighters, Jelly Bellys… actually if anyone aged Jelly Bellys in a whiskey cask for a month this is exactly how I imagine they would taste.

In the mouth: Oily and savoury, “Slap Yo Mama” seasoning, burned sugar, charred whisky staves, cayenne pepper finish.


Firstly no scores due to my not having any other reference point, but I certainly enjoyed  the Henry McKenna and Elijah Craig more than the others.  Altogether great fun and very interesting. Adding water did not bring out layers of hidden flavour like I might have expected in Scotch, but it did make these powerful whiskeys more approachable due to the lower proof.  I would not say any of them were tongue sucking and lip-smackingly delicious, but they were all intriguing.

Perhaps more interestingly, I took the remainder of these samples to some friends, now that the UK restrictions allow it.  I also took some Scotch.  Within the social setting of drinking beers, telling stories, and generally not paying as much attention to the spirits (as I think Scotch often requires) the bourbons were the hit of the night.  They created a real talking point and balancing them with the flavours of the hoppy craft beers and lagers was quite successful.

I’m not sure that I would rush out to buy a bottle of bourbon for myself on the back of the tasting.  I would consider taking one ‘round to a social garden BBQ or boozy poker night before I’d take a bottle of Scotch whisky.  As an aside: for fancier affairs – such as pre-wedding or post-wedding socials – I like take a bottle of Compass Box Hedonism.  What I am certain of is that I am much more likely to try bourbon this summer by the dram in bars and hospitality.  I’ll definitely start to read the Bourbon reviews on Malt, I promise!  I’ll probably look out for more bourbon tastings too.  Now my resolve is broken, I’m going to have to find some more bandwidth.


Graham is at the consumer end of the whisky world; constantly seeking out a bargains and generally very cautious with his limited budget. An occasional visitor to distilleries and a member of the odd whisky club. He does not collect whiskies but has a few nice ones put away for some future special occasion. He enjoys discussions with the wider whisky community and may resemble the ‘average’ Malt reader.

  1. Saxon McD says:

    Sorry Taylor, but completely fail to see the point in publishing American whiskey reviews from someone who admits to having no context whatsoever for the category. Signed Pete Tong.

    1. Taylor says:

      Saxon, if you go back in the Malt archives a few years, you’ll find a number of fairly novice American whiskey reviews from some of our founders. Whisky/whiskey is a big (and growing) world, and folks are branching out into different regions and styles they may not be familiar with. I thought it might be helpful to some of our Scotch-focused readers to hear the perspective of another bourbon-curious Scotch lover. Graham acknowledged his lack of context (and, as a consequence, declined to give scores), but I felt that his tasting notes and impressions have value nonetheless, and made for a good, light Saturday read. Hopefully this helps clarify?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *