I first tasted Paul John Nirvana at the beginning of my more serious foray into the world of whisky. It was the very first Indian whisky I’d ever tasted. In fact, until that point, I was not even aware that India produced any whisky at all! Given that India is reportedly the largest consumer of whisky world-wide, it’s surprising that I was completely unaware of the links between India and whisky – both as a major market and as a whisky-producing country itself.

Perhaps one reason for this is that a variety of Indian spirits labelled “whisky” have historically been made from a blend of neutral spirits and molasses (and so not the genuine thing). However, India has been producing quality single malt whiskies for a few decades now. That said, it was only very recently (on the 20th of February, 2025) that the Indian Malt Whisky Association formally requested geographical indication status for Indian single malts, alongside a push to establish regulations requiring that Indian single malt whisky be made from only 100% malted barley, yeast and water, in addition to being aged for a minimum of three years in oak casks, and distilled in copper pot stills at a single distillery.

Paul John Nirvana is produced by John Distilleries, a company which also makes other alcoholic beverages, including brandy and wine. John Distilleries is a fairly new addition to the world of whisky, all things considered. While the company began producing blended whisky under the name ‘Original Choice’ in 1996, they only began to produce their very own line of single malt whisky under the name ‘Paul John’ in 2008, releasing their first single malt in 2012. The headquarters of the company are in Bangalore, but their main distillery which produces Paul John is located in Goa, on India’s west coast. Despite being relatively young by industry standards, John Distilleries has gained international recognition for its single malt whiskies, many of which are now winning awards.

Paul John single malts are generally bottled at 46% ABV, non-chill filtered and naturally coloured. They also tend to be no-age-statement (NAS) releases. This is due in part to India’s hot climate, which accelerates the maturation process compared to whisky in matured in cooler climates, like Scotland. Another fairly unique feature of Paul John single malts is the use of Indian six-row barley, which has a higher protein content than the more commonly used two-row variety. This may contribute to a richer and more robust flavour profile. Paul John do, however, have a few peated bottlings too, and for these they incorporate some imported peated Scottish barley.

Paul John Nirvana is the brand’s entry-level release – presented in bright and cheerful orange packaging. It’s a NAS, unpeated, single malt. Departing from the typical characteristics of Paul John’s core range, Nirvana is typically bottled at an approachable 40% ABV (though the version in the South African market is bottled at 43% ABV). There isn’t any obvious information available on either the bottle or the distillery website regarding the type of casks the whisky is aged in – although their official tasting notes suggest you should get a whiff of bourbon, so perhaps that’s a hint.

It’s not a whisky I’ve ever seen in standard bottle stores, so it might be a bit tricky to find. However, it’s usually available through boutique whisky retailers, and at a very affordable price – around $26 (roughly the same price as a bottle of Maker’s Mark).

I remember that the first time I nosed and tasted this particular whisky all those years ago my overwhelming impression was that of Christmas cake. I really enjoyed it. So much so that I even bought myself a bottle on the spot.

Paul John Nirvana – Review

Colour: Deep gold.

On the nose: Honeyed sweetness, with lots of dried fruits – apricots, raisins and sultanas. There’s also a strong undertone of aromatic baking spices, reminiscent of fruitcake. A distinct and dominant walnut note makes an appearance.

In the mouth: Rich and round, with a sweetness that leans towards caramel and toffee. Some vanilla. The baking spices from the nose carry through to the palate, with hints of cinnamon and ginger. There’s also a slightly drying, earthy note that helps to balance the sweetness. Some lingering spice on the finish.

Conclusion:

While I still enjoy this whisky, I now find it a little too sweet for my personal taste. Still, I think this whisky can work very well both casual sipping and as part of a whisky exploration journey… And if I’m in the right mood, I’ll still happily enjoy a dram. My suspicion is that those who are fairly new to whisky will find it quite appealing, given its lower ABV, and its sweetness and richness. It may also appeal to those who enjoy bourbon or generally sweeter whiskies.

And for anyone who hasn’t yet tried an Indian whisky, Paul John Nirvana is a great place to start. It’s a decent whisky, and a very accessible option for those looking to explore something new without spending too much.

Score: 5/10

Genevieve

Genevieve is a whisky enthusiast from South Africa with a PhD in Philosophy, so she enjoys drinking and thinking about whisky. She loves tasting new whiskies whenever she gets the chance - so much so that a few years ago she set up a small whisky tasting business, "Kenton on Whisky", in the tiny coastal town where she lives (an excellent excuse to grow her selection of whiskies beyond reasonable limits).

  1. Ravi says:

    I had already been through their Edited, Brilliance, Bold, PX, Oloroso, and 2023 Christmas Edition before I finally tried the entry level Nirvana. Definitely suffers from comparison with the 46% or more abv of those other variants. Nevertheless, it is a good one to have if you are dipping your feet into Paul John or Indian Single Malts in general. Well made.

    Indian Single Malts are still hit and miss, outside of Paul John and Amrut portfolios.

    1. Stretch says:

      I’m glad someone is still writing reviews here. You’re doing great work. YouTube reviewers tend to be too bombastic for my tastes. I miss the generally thought-out prose from the contributors to this site. Regarding Indian Whisky, I’ve liked what I’ve sampled so far which is pretty limited. Paul John Christmas is a good winter dram. Amrut Fusion is very nice and their Cask Strength was challenging but can be tamed with some water.

      1. Genevieve says:

        Thanks so much Stretch, I really appreciate it! I’ve had very limited exposure to Amrut, but I enjoyed the two I’ve tried (Amrut Peated and Amrut Naarangi) – and I’m keen to try one of the Paul John Christmas editions one day. Sounds like we’ve had similar experiences so far with Indian whisky!

    2. Genevieve says:

      Thanks Ravi, sounds like you’ve explored a good range of their lineup! So far, the only Indian whiskies I’ve tasted have been from Paul John and Amrut as well. I’ve actually just acquired another bottle from Paul John, and I’m looking forward to opening it!

  2. Mahmoud Ali says:

    Indian single malts have been improving over time. I still recall trying some Amrut at a whisky festival and did not like them at all. Being a wine drinker I was struck by a sense of “heat damage” in that they all had a baked quality, something that lingered on my palate for a half hour and ruined my appreciation of other whiskies. Fast forward a few years and at an in-store tasting I was surprised at how much better an Amrut bottling was – sorry, I can’t remember which one. Since then I have been impressed by Amrut’s Cask Strength, Kadhamban and, a little less so, Fusion.

    As for Paul John, I have not had the Nirvana and am not likely to do so because of the low alcohol. I have enjoyed Brilliance, Bold, Edited, and the Oloroso Cask Finish, with my wife’s favourite being the Christmas Edition 2021.

    A new one on the block is Indri from Picadilly Distilleries. The Trini is the one that took the world by storm but the one I liked was the Triple Cask.

    1. Genevieve says:

      Thanks for sharing your experiences Mahmoud Ali! I’ve only tasted Nirvana bottled at 43% ABV , not their official 40%, which might make a small difference. I’ll definitely keep an eye out for Indri — I haven’t seen anything from them yet, but you’ve piqued my interest!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *